GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING PIGS FED FROM DIFFERENT FEEDING TROUGHS

A. O. K. Adesehinwa, B. A. Makanjuola, E. Ajayi, J. O. Saka, D. J. Ogunyemi, A. O. Sorunke, B. A. Boladuro, J. O. Abiola

Abstract


Growth performance of growing pigs fed from concrete feeding trough, semi-automatic feeder and their combination was examined for eight weeks. Ninety-nine growing cross bred (Large white x Landrace) pigs of average initial live weight of 18.19±0.31 Kg were assigned to three dietary treatments, comprising three replicates of 11 growing pigs each in completely randomized design. A standard diet was fed to the animals in concrete feeding trough (T1; plate 1), concrete feeding trough and semi-automatic feeder (T2; plate 2) and semi-automatic feeder (T3; plate 3). Feed and water were given ad lib and weekly feed intake and weights were recorded. Feed conversion ratio and daily weight gain were calculated. The overall performance showed that combination of the feeders (T2) improved the daily weight gain (448.74 g) and average daily feed intake (1666.56 g). The pigs fed from both feeders (T2) had the highest (P<0.05) total cost of feeding (₦9293.40) while the lowest cost of feeding (₦8691.50) was observed in pigs fed from semi-automatic feeder (T3). In conclusion, the combination of concrete feeding trough and semi-automatic feeders improved the average daily weight gain and average daily feed intake of growing pigs when compared with the pigs fed from concrete feeding trough.

Keywords


Concrete feeding trough, Semi-automatic feeder, Growth performance, Economic of production

Full Text:

PDF

References


AOAC (2002). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc., USA.

Bergstrom, J. R., Tokach, M. D., Dritz, S. S., Nelssen, J. L., DeRouchey, J. M. and Goodband, R. D. (2009). The effects of feeder design on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 87 (Supplement 2): 183 (Abstract.)

Bergstrom, J. R. Nelssen, J. L., Edwards, L. N, Tokach, M. D., Dritz, S. S. Goodband, R. D. and DeRouchey J. M. (2015). Effects of feeder design and changing source of water to a location separate from the wet-dry feeder at 4 or 8 weeks before harvest on growth, feeding behavior, and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs, American Journal of Animal Science 90:4567–4575

Brumm, M. C. and Gonyou, H. W. (2001). Effects of facility design on behavior and feed and water intake. In Swine Nutrition 2nd edition. pp 499-518.

Dong, G. Z. and Pluske, J. R. (2007). The low feed intake in newly-weaned pigs: problems and possible solutions. Asian Journal of Animal Science; 20:440-452.

Gonyou, H. W. and Lou, Z. (2000). Effects of eating space and availability in feeders on productivity and eating behavior of grower/finisher pigs. Journal of Animal Science https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.784865x.

He, Y., Cui, S., Deen J., Shurson G. C. and Li Y. (2016). Effects of feeder space allowance on behavior of slow-growing pigs during the nursery period. Journal of Animal Science. 94(Supplement 2):4

Hurst, D., Clarke L. and Lean I. J. (2008). Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 2:1297–1302.

López-Vergé, S., Gasa J., Temple D., Bonet J., Coma J. and Solà-Oriol D. (2018). Strategies to improve the growth and homogeneity of growing-finishing pigs: feeder space and feeding management Porcine Health Management 4:14

Myers, A. J., Goodband, R. D., Tokach, M. D. Dritz, S. S., DeRouchey, J. M. and Nelssen, J. L. (2013). The effects of diet form and feeder design on the growth performance of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 91:3420–3428.

National Research Council (1998). Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Animal Production Research