U. Abdullahi, J. T. Amodu, M. R. Hassan, A. M. Abdullahi, Y. M. Ishiaku, S. A. Ahmed, S. G. Salisu, U. S. Jibril, B. M. Munza


The study was conducted to evaluate the agronomic potential of Double-red maize intercropped with Tephrosia bracteolata at the Breeder Seed Unit of National Animal Production Research Institute Shika, Zaria. The experiment was laid out in a 6×2×3 factorial arrangement in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates, which consists of four intercropping pattern (1:1, 1:2, 2:1 and 2:2 maize/T. bracteolata intra-row ratio) with sole maize and sole T. bracteolata, two plant spacing (25×60cm and 50×60cm) and three replications. Seedling emergence averaged 74.85% for maize and 79.35% for T. bracteolata. Plant height, number of leaves per plant and leaf area index (LAI) of maize and T. bracteolata and number of branches of T. bracteolata were significantly (P<0.05) affected by intercropping. There was no significant (p>0.05) effect of plant spacing on all growth components except plant height and LAI of maize. Plant height, number leaves per plant and LAI were significantly (P<0.05) affected by age of plant. The highest plant height (169.13cm), number of leaves per plant (12.00) and LAI (2.63) of maize were obtained at 12WAS. Fresh and dry matter yields were significantly (P<0.05) affected by intercropping pattern. The highest fresh forage yield (26.47 and 28.94t/ha) and dry matter yield (6.17 and 5.90t/ha) of maize and T. bracteolata, respectively were observed in sole treatments. Maize grain yield and land equivalent ratio were significantly (P<0.05) affected by intercropping. The highest value of 3.04t/ha for maize grain was recorded in sole maize treatment while the highest Land Equivalent Ratio LERs (1.50and 1.39) were recorded in 1:1 and 2:1 maize/T. bracteolata mixtures, respectively. Interactions significantly (P<0.05) affected only T. bracteolata forages. The study showed that among all intercropped mixtures, the 1:1 maize/T. bracteolata was preferable according to forage yield and maize grain yield than other intercropped mixtures. Plant spacing of 25×60cm had better nutrient compositions for maize forage. Intercropping Double-red maize with T. bracteolata in 1:1 intra-row ratio at plant spacing of 25×60cm is hereby recommended for smallholder farmers and livestock owners in Shika, Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria.

Full Text:



Abdulrahaman, A. A. and Kolawole O. M. (2006). Traditional Preparations and Uses of Maize in Nigeria. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 10: 219-227.

Abubakar, H., Lemma, G., & Rethman, N. F. G. (2006). Effect of Lablab purpureus and Vicia atropurpuria as an intercrop, or in a crop rotation, on grain and forage yields of maize in Ethiopia. Tropical Grasslands, 40,111-118.

Abuzar, M. R., Sadozai, G. U., Baloch, M. S., Baloch, A. A., Shah, I. H. Javaid, T. and Hussain, N. (2011). Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(4):692-695

Amjad, A. A., Theodore, J. K. R. and Nguyen, V. H. (2014). Effect of Intercropping Three Legume Species on Early Growth of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.) Hānai‘Ai / The Food Provider,1:1-5

Amole, T. A., Oduguwa, B. O., Onifade, S. O., Jolaosho, A. O., Amodu, J. T. and Arigbede, M. O. (2015). Effect of Planting Patterns and Age at Harvest of Two Cultivars of Lablab purpureus in Andropogon gayanus on Agronomic Characteristic and Quality of Grass/Legume Mixtures Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 38 (3) 329 – 346

AOAC, (2005). Official Method of Analysis. International, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 24th edition Washington D.C. USA. Pp 200- 210.

Adesoji, A. G., Abubakar, I. U., Tanimu, B. and Labe, D. A. (2013). Influence of Incorporated Short Duration Legume Fallow and Nitrogen on Maize, American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 13(1):58-67

Baldé, A. B., Scopel, E., Affholder, F., Corbeels, M., Da Silva, F. A. M., Xavier, J. H. V. and Wery, J. (2011). Agronomic Performance of No-Tillage Relay Intercropping with Maize under Smallholder Conditions in Central Brasil. Field Crops Research, 124:240-251.

Bamikole, M. A., Akinsoyinu, A. O., Ezenwa, I., Babayemi, O. J., Akinlade, J. and Adewumi, M. K. (2004). Effect of six weekly harvests on the yield, chemical composition and dry matter degradability of Panicum maximum and Stylosanthes hamata in Nigeria. Grass and Forage Science, 59: 357 – 163

Bilalis, D. J., Sidiras, N., Kakampouki, I., Efthimiadou, A., Papatheohari, Y. and Thomopoulos, P. (2005). Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Maize/Legume Intercrop in a Clay Loam Soil and Mediterranean Climate – Can the Land Equivalent Ratio Index (LER) be used for Root Development? Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 3 (3&4): 117-123.

Birteeb, P. T., Addah, W., Jakper, N., and Addo-Kwafo, A. (2011). Effects of intercropping cereal-legume on biomass and grain yield in the savannah zone. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23:192-198. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from

Davi, C. M., Reddy, B.R. Reddy P.M. and Reddy, S.C.S. (1995). Effects on Nitrogen levels and plant density on yield and quality of JKHY-1 cotton, Current Agricultural Research, 8(3/4): 144-146.

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple Range and F-tests. Biometric, 11:1-42.

Dwomon, I. B. and Quainoo, A. K. (2012). Effect of Spatial Arrangement on the Yield of Maize and Groundnut Intercrop in the Northern Guinea Savanna Agro-ecological zone of Ghana. Internationnal Journal of Lifescience. Botany and Pharmacology Research, 1(2): 78-75

Filho, J. M. L. (2000). Physiological Responses of Maize and Cowpea to Intercropping. Pesq. Brasilia, 35(5):915-921.

Gabatshele, M. L., Teko, K. M. and Witness M. (2012). Effects of Intercropping on the Performance of Maize and Cowpeas in Botswana. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2(6): 307-310. DOI: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20120206.07

Gbaraneh, L. D., Ikpe, F. N., Larbi, A., Wahua, T. A. T., & Torunana, J. M. A. (2004). The Influence of Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on Grain and Fodder Yield of Maize (Zea mays) in a Humid Forest Region of Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 8(2): 45-50.

Ghanbari, A., Dahmardeh, M., Siahsar, B. A., and Ramroudi, M. (2010). Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) - cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in and environment. Journal of Food, Agronomy and Environment, 8:102–108.

Hassan, M. R., Amodu, J. T., Muhammad, I. R., Jokthan, G. E., Abdu, S. B., Abdullahi, B., Adamu, H. Y., Musa, A., Sani, I. and Akpensuen, T. T. (2014). Forage Yield and Quality of Lablab (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) Intercropped with Maize (Zea mays L.) With Flooded Irrigation System in the Semi-Arid Zone of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(11): 196-211.

Hirpa, T. (2014). Effect of Intercrop Row Arrangement on Maize and Haricot Bean Productivity and Residual Soil. Global Journal of Science Inc. (USA), 14(4) 27-34

IAR (2016). Institute of Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Metrological Data Information of Samaru and its Environs.

IITA (2012). International Institute for Tropical Agriculture. Growing in Nigeria. Commercial Crop Production Guide Series. Information and Communication Support for Agricultural Growth in Nigeria. USAID Pp 1-8.

Iken, J.E. and Amusa, N.A (2014) Maize research and production in Nigeria. Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR and T.), 1:302-30S7.

Ishiaku, Y. M. (2016). Productivity of Columbus grass (Sorghum almun) intercropped with lablab legume and their utilization by growing Red Sokoto bucks in Shika, Nigeria. MSc. Dissertation, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Pp112

Ishiaku, Y.M., Amodu J.T., Hassan, M.R., Tanko, R J., Abubakar, S. A., Ahmed S. A., Ibrahim, H., Lasisi, O. T., Haruna, M. A., Bala, A. M. and Muraina, T. O. (2015). Effect of stage of maturity on yield and nutrient quality of Tephrosia (Tephrosia bracteolata Perr. Guil.) in Shika, Nigeria. In: Olonite, J. A., Onifade, O. S. and Jooasho, A. O. (eds). First Biennial Coference: Society for Grassland Research and Development in Nigeria. University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State. Pp17-19.

ISU (Iowa State University) (2012). Field Crop Insects. Iowa Soybean Association, Pp 4-5

Lelmel, A. (2013). The effect of intercropping maize with cowpea and lablab on crop yield. Herald Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Research, 2(5): 156-170.

Maqbool, M. M., Tanveer A., Ata, Z. and Ahmad, R. (2006). Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Affected by Row Spacing and Weed Competition Durations. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38(4): 1227-1236.

Matusso, J.M.M., Mugwe, J.N. and Mucheru-Muna, M. (2012). Potential role of cereal-legume intercropping systems in integrated soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa. Third RUFORUM Biennial Meeting24-28, Entebbe, Uganda.

Mbomi, S. E., Anjah, G. M., Lamare, D. M. and Oben, F. T. (2012). Effects of inter-row and intra-row spacing of three Tephrosia species and their influence on soil fertility. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(3): 102-107

Mkamilo, G. S. (2004). Maize-Sesame intercropping in Southeast Tanzania: Farmers practices and perceptions and intercrop performance. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Netherlands. Pp112

Mutungamiri, A., Mariga, I. K. and Chivenge, O. A. (2001). Effect of maize density, bean cultiva and bean spatial arrangement on intercropped performance. African Crop Science Journal, 9: 487497.

Odedire, J. A. and Babayemi, O. J. (2016). Preliminary study on Tephrosia candida as forage alternative to Leucaena leucocephala for ruminant nutrition in Southwest Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 9:1-10.

Ojo, V. O. A., Aina, A. B. J., Arigbede, O. M., Olanite, J. A., Amole, T. A., Anele, Y. U., Dele, P. A., Adeoye, S. A. and Dowu, O. J. (2012). Evaluation of the Agronomic Performance and Nutritive Values of Tephrosia bracteolata Guill. aand Perr. and Gmelina arborea ROXB Prunnings at Different Stages of Growth. Journal of Agricultural Science and Environment, 12(2):15-25.

Ovimap (2016). Ovi location map: ovi earth imagery data.

Rashid, S. (2010). Economic feasibility of integrated nutrient management for sustainable rainfed maize-legume based intercropping systems Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the Department of Agronomy University of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Pp331.

Rees, D. J. (1986). Crop growth, development and yield in intercropping sorghum with cowpea in semi-arid conditions in Botswana. II. Experimental Agriculture, 22(2):169−177.

SAS, (2005). Statistical Analysis Software (CD-ROM), Version 8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N. C., USA

Seran, T. H. and Brintha, I. (2010). Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of Agronomy, 9(3):135-145

Souza, F. S., Rebeiro, R. H. E., Veloso, C. A. C. and Correan, L. A. (2012). Yielding and phenotypic stability of corn cultivars in three municipal districts of para State, Brazil. Pesquisa- Agrepercuria Brazileira, 37: 1269-1274

Tarawali, S. A., Tarawali, G., Larbi, A. and Hanson, J. (1995). Methods of evaluation of legumes, grasses and fodder tress for use as livestock feed. International Livestock Research Institute, Manual. Nairobi, Kenya. Pp1-12

Thobatsi, T. J. (2009). Growth and yield responses of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) in an intercropping system. Masters dissertation. University of Pretoria, South Africa. Pp 58-67.

Twala, M. G. and Ossom, E. M. (2004). Legume-Maize Association Influences Crops Characteristics and Yields. 4th International Crop Science Congress. 26-Set – 01-Oct, 2004. Brisbane, Australia.

Valadabadi, S. A. and Farahani, H. A. (2010).Effects of planting density and pattern on physiological growth indices in maize (Zea mays L.) under nitrogenous fertilizer application. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 2(3): 040-047.

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., and Lewis, B. A. (1991). Method for directory Neutral detergent fibre and Non-starch polysaccharides in relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:3583-3597.

haseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, 79: 519- 529.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Animal Production Research